Daily Edition · Page 1

THE DAILY INDEX

Technology, AI, software, security, crypto and business

Across today’s newsletters

Today’s Index

SEC 'EARNEST' ABOUT FINDING WORKABLE CRYPTO POLICY, COMMISSIONERS SAY AT ROUNDTABLE

The SEC recently held its first crypto-focused roundtable, where Commissioner Hester Peirce stressed the agency's commitment to working closely with the industry to develop a clear regulatory framework for digital assets. This includes making progress towards translating diverse crypto asset characteristics into a coherent taxonomy, greater guidance on NFTs, and seeking greater transparency on memecoin policies.

APPLE WANTS TO TURN ITS WATCHES INTO WEARABLE AI

Apple plans to turn the Apple Watch into an AI-infused wearable. It is working on a version of the smartwatch equipped with cameras, which will allow the device to do things like identify objects or translate text in a picture. Apple has had issues with implementing AI features and its past attempts at expanding the functionality of the Apple Watch have not gone well. The company is reportedly close to ditching a plastic version of the Apple Watch SE that was supposed to help bring the price of the device down.

1X WILL TEST HUMANOID ROBOTS IN ‘A FEW HUNDRED' HOMES IN 2025

1X plans to start early tests of its Neo Gamma humanoid robot in up to a few thousand homes by the end of 2025. The company will be initially relying on teleoperators - customers will be able to decide when a 1X employee can view Neo Gamma's surroundings. The in-home tests will allow the company to collect data on how the robot operates to create a dataset for training AI models and upgrading the robot's capabilities. A video of the robot vacuuming carpet during a demo at a show is available in the article.

POST 50: GOOD RESEARCH TAKES ARE NOT SUFFICIENT FOR GOOD STRATEGIC TAKES

Having a good research track record is evidence of good big-picture takes about AGI, but it's weak evidence. Strategic thinking requires different skills - people often conflate these skills, leading to excessive deference to researchers without evidence of whether that person is good at strategic thinking specifically. Having good strategic takes is important and researchers should spend a fair amount of time developing the skill. People should be skeptical about people's strategic takes until they have proven they have the skill to make good strategic takes.

TLDR IndexPage 1