KALSHI LOSES APPEAL OVER OHIO AND TENNESSEE SPORTS BETTING LAWS
The Sixth Circuit unanimously ruled that Kalshi hasn't shown its sports event contracts qualify as swaps under the Commodity Exchange Act, upholding Ohio's win and vacating Kalshi's injunction against Tennessee, leaving the company 1-for-3 across circuit court decisions (it won in the Third Circuit against New Jersey, lost in the Ninth Circuit in Nevada). The panel leaned on Kalshi's own earlier concession that its sports contracts have "no inherent economic significance," and New Jersey has already asked the Supreme Court to review the Third Circuit ruling, meaning the underlying jurisdictional fight over prediction markets could be headed there.