TOO DANGEROUS FOR C++

Summary from the TLDR Web Dev newsletter

This article compares Rust's memory safety with C++ by illustrating a scenario involving an internal library written in Rust. Initially, the author used Rust's “Rc” type for reference counting but encountered thread safety issues. Upon switching to Rust's “Arc” type, which provides atomic reference counting, the compiler enforced thread safety, ensuring data race conditions were prevented at compile time. C++ lacks such safety features, relying on developers to manually handle thread safety, which can lead to subtle bugs and undefined behavior. Rust's borrow checker and type system statically prevents data races, making it unique among programming languages.